🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."